Tuesday, December 23, 2008

Who's in Control?

Who's in Control
The Unhappy Consequences of Being Child-Centered
by Jean Leidloff

It took some time before the significance of what I was looking at sank into my "civilized" mind. I had spent more than two years living in the jungles of South America with Stone Age Indians. Little boys traveled with us when we enlisted their fathers as guides and crew, and we often stayed for days or weeks in the villages of the Yequana Indians where the children played all day unsupervised by adults or adolescents. It only struck me after the fourth of my five expeditions that I had never seen a conflict either between two children or between a child and an adult. Not only did the children not hit one another, they did not even argue. They obeyed their elders instantly and cheerfully, and often carried babies around with them while playing or helping with the work.

Where were the "terrible twos"? Where were the tantrums, the struggle to "get their own way," the selfishness, the destructiveness and carelessness of their own safety that we call normal? Where was the nagging, the discipline, the "boundaries" needed to curb their contrariness? Where, indeed, was the adversarial relationship we take for granted between parent and child? Where was the blaming, the punishing, or for that matter, where was any sign of permissiveness?

Rest of the article

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Just another reason for the Family Homestead! More room to move and less control will be needed. Loved ones nearby breeds security and comfort...therefore less contention. In today's urban setting everything is so controlled because it would otherwise disrupt what's going on next to it. Ahhh...homestead dreaming!
I love you Sweet Pea

Manda McDaniel said...

I heard Michael Pollan today on NPR and thought of you! Hope your Christmas is merry!